Legal Opinion

Eddens v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 18, 1905No. 3168PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of hog-theft, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary. The State’s case, depended largely upon the testimony of Ike Howard and John Mitchell, who were accomplices. The court instructed that said parties were accomplices, and that their testimony would have to be corroborated before conviction could be had thereon. Appellant excepted to this charge for the reason that it failed to instruct the jury that one accomplice could not corroborate another. This latter proposition is a well known rule of law, and such a charge…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Silvas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Fields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Fruger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Lafell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API