Legal Opinion

Beal v. Armstrong Containers Inc

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 30, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00378Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ARRIEONA BEAL, Plaintiff, Case No. 22-cv-378-pp v. ARMSTRONG CONTAINERS, INC., EI DUPONT DENEMOURS & CO., JERRY MITCHELL, HATTIE MITCHELL, THE ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY and THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND (DKT. NO. 11), AWARDING PLAINTIFF COSTS AND ACTUAL EXPENSES UNDER

28 U.S.C. §1447

(C), DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 11 (DKT. NO. 35) AND REMANDING CASE TO MILWAUKEE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT On June 2, 2021, the plaintiff sued…

2Cases cited28 opinions

Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
Schur v. L.A. Weight Loss Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
In Re: Karen A. Briscoe Alfred Lara Wanda T. Kizer Debra Alexander Rhonda Allen Mary Green Glenda D. Abbott and Leslie BalesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
Gus Poulos and A.G.P. Marketing v. Naas Foods, Incorporated and Ranks, Hovis, McDougall Plc Group (Rhm Holdings U.S.A. Incorporated)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
Craig Garbie v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.