Legal Opinion

Industrial Heating & Engineering Co. v. Austin

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

On December 6, 1921, the plaintiff contracted in writing with the defendant to furnish and install for $900 a complete steam-heating system in defendant’s garage, excepting that defendant was to provide a suitable smokestack for the boiler. The contract had the following provision: “Office to be heated to 70° and garage to 50° at 10° below zero.” The system failed to function as agreed, and plaintiff claimed that was due to the insufficiency oí the stack. On April 24, 1923, in a supplemental written *369agreement'the defendant agreed to pay to plaintiff an unpaid balance of $175 and $25…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dreher v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Smith v. HaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Becker v. Beaver Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Rauch v. BensmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Pinter v. WenzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joslin v. National Reserve InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API