Legal Opinion

Myers v. Crouse-Hinds Division of Cooper Industries, Inc.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2016No. Nos. 49S00-1502-MI-119, 49S00-1501-MI-35, 49S00-1501-MI-36Published

1Opinion of the Court

MASSA, J., dissents with separate opinion in which RUSH, C.J., concurs.

2DissentMassa, J.

The State’s Brief in Support of Rehearing raises issues worthy of more deliberative consideration, several of which were noted in dissents from the Court’s opinion, Myers v. Crouse-Hinds Div. of Cooper Indus., Inc., No. 49S00-1501-MI-35, 53 N.E.3d 1160, 1169, 2016 WL 825111, at *6, *8 (Ind. Mar. 2, 2016) (Rush, C.J., and Massa, J., dissenting with separate opinions). The Brief overlooks, however, the most compelling precedents in its favor that should'be noted sua sponte for lawyers and judges going forward.

Forty years ago,…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Griffin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Larry Myers v. Crouse-Hinds: GE v. Mary R. Geyman: Owens-Illinois, Inc v. Mary R. GeymanIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Davis-Martin County Rural Telephone Corp. v. Public Service CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Harrow v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Sendak v. DebroIndiana Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API