Legal Opinion

Kessel v. Kessel

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1993No. 93-CA-0470PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ARMSTRONG, Judge.

The appellant, Marie Espenan Kessel Schnexayder, is appealing the trial court’s denial of her rule for contempt and to make executory past due child support.

The record reflects that appellant and Gary John Kessel, the appellee herein were divorced by a judgment rendered on October *1520, 1988. By that judgment Mrs. Schnexayl der was awarded physical custody of the' minor child and child support. Mrs. Sehnexr ayder filed a rule on October 28, 1988 tó. increase the child support. Thereafter, at a hearing on September 30, 1992, the parties entered into a consent judgment in which -’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Braning v. BraningLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Hogan v. HoganLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Tobin v. ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Clinton v. ClintonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rigaud v. DeRuiseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API