Legal Opinion
Target National Bank v. Nelson (In re Nelson)
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
Decided December 11, 2013No. Bankruptcy No. 6:12-BK-30664-SC; Adversary No. 6:12-AP-01480-SCPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO FRBP 9011
SCOTT C. CLARKSON, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter came on to be heard on November 13, 2013 on the Court’s sua sponte order to show cause (the “OSC”) why sanctions should not be imposed against Weinstein, Pinson & Riley, P.S. (‘WPR”), the attorneys for Target National Bank (“Target”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9011.1 William S. Weinstein, Esq. (“Weinstein”), Josh Harrison, Esq. (“Harrison”), Gail A Rinaldi, Esq. (“Rinaldi”), and an officer from Target, Adam Grim, appeared on behalf of Target.
II.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wansdown Properties Corporation N.V. v. AzariUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2022