Bethea v. City of Little Rock
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Per curiam
Appellant has sought to appeal from a judgment of conviction in the amount of $129.00 and costs. The arguments contained in the briefs seem to indicate that appellant was convicted under a Little Rock city ordinance which prohibits the occupancy of premises upon which are stored abandoned vehicles.
Appellant has failed to abstract such material parts of the record as are necessary to an understanding of all questions presented to this court for decision as required by Rule 9(d), Rules of the Supreme Court, Ark. Stat. Ann., Vol. 3A, p. 485 (Repl. 1979); therefore, we must affirm the trial court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bank of Ozark v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Dyke Industries, Inc. v. E. W. Johnson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Smith v. BullardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Wade v. Franklin-Stricklin Land Surveyors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trice v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Trice v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983