Legal Opinion
Pinto v. Wynstra
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 1964PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn J. Dillon, J.
This is a proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR, in the nature of mandamus, to compel the respondents to comply with article 16 of the General Municipal Law by establishing a grievance procedure and creating a public employee grievance board for the benefit of teachers in the public school system of the City of Yonkers. The petitioner has been a teacher in that system since September, 1961, and is now completing her third year on a nontenure basis. In the latter part of March, 1964 she was told by her principal that she would not be recommended for tenure. This was tantamount to telling her…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- O'Connor v. EmersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Matter of O'Connor v. . EmersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- High v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Matter of High v. Bd. of Educ. of Union Free Sch. Dist.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- High v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3Cited by7 opinions
- Willard v. Khotol Services CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Van Gorder v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Nassau Chapter v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Pinto v. WynstraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Newman v. Board of Education of the Mt. Pleasant School DistrictCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.