Legal Opinion

Blum v. Hodapp

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1949No. 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This cause comes into this court on appeal on questions of law and fact by Alfred S. Daneman from the judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County, in which court a judgment was granted to the plaintiffs, appellees here, awarding them an injunction against the threatened use by the defendants of a one-story business building, upon the ground that such use violated a certain building restriction on the plat in which it was located.

The amended petition, which named as plaintiffs approximately 106 lot owners, alleged the creation of certain building restrictions in the Berkley Heights…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lopartkovich v. RiegerOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Olmsted v. SchrembsOhio Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loichot v. Allstate Development Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Brown v. Miami Valley Hospital SocietyOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Mahrt v. First Church of ChristMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas · 1955
  4. King v. JamesOhio Court of Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API