Legal Opinion

Forrest v. Zeeco, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 23, 2025No. 4:22-cv-00427Unknown

1Opinion

Gnited States District Court for the s2orthern District of Oklahoma Case No. 22-cv-427-JDR-SH NATHAN FORREST, Plaintiff, PeErsUs ZEECO, INC., Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER After suffering a stroke, Mr. Forrest took time away from his work at Zeeco, Inc. to recover, attend appointments, and receive follow-up care. He was cleared to return to work without restrictions. Later, Zeeco allegedly in- creased Mr. Forrest’s workload, placed him on a performance improvement plan, and issued a final written warning. Mr. Forrest resigned rather than sign the written warning and sued Zeeco for violating…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. Lincoln v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  4. Muldrow v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
  5. Sanchez v. Denver Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API