Edwards v. State

on rehearing.

December 23, 1914.

PRENDER GAST, Presiding Judge.

—There is but one question necessary to be further discussed,—all others, as raised in the record, were correctly decided in the original opinion. That question is whether or not appellant should have been permitted to have asked W. 0. Odom,, one of the State’s witnesses, on cross-examination, and had him answer,, that he was in favor of Mrs. Trevathan for county clerk, and went toPolloek the day of the election to work for her and against Mr. Ivy, her opponent, and that he was on the opposite side of that question from appellant,…