Legal Opinion

Sikorski v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 8, 1983No. 66367PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiff Lilli Sikorski brought this action against three medical doctors seeking to recover damages for malpractice. The complaint alleged that the defendants in providing medical care to the plaintiff performed eye operations on her and as a result she lost the sight of both eyes; that the cause of plaintiffs injury was the failure of the defendants to exercise reasonable care and skill commensurate with the standard practiced by the medical community at the time and under the circumstances; that the defendants failed to properly evaluate and treat plaintiffs…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shea v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  2. Kenney v. Piedmont HospitalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Parker v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Self v. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE GEORGIA BAPTIST CONVENTION OF GEORGIA, INC.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  5. Young v. YarnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beauchamp v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Spikes v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Beatty v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Kellos v. SawilowskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. West v. BREAST CARE SPECIALISTS, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API