Rhoden v. Rhoden

ON MOTION TO ENFORCE MANDATE

This cause is before us on appellant’s motion to enforce this court’s mandate. 538 So.2d 1274. We find that the motion has merit in that on remand, the trial court failed to precisely follow the stipulations of the parties concerning their MacGlen, Inc. and George Rhoden Agency, Inc. interests. In order to precisely implement the stipulations of the parties, the trial court must:(1) Equalize the distribution of the salaries paid out by MacGlen, Inc. to the parties between 1983 and 1985. Although the trial court found that the' salary monies were used to benefit the…