Legal Opinion

Carter v. Rinker

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas

Decided December 13, 1909PublishedCited by 9 opinions

At Raw. Action by Jessie Carter against james M. Rinker. On demurrer to petition.

1Opinion of the Court

PHI RIPS, District Judge.

'Phis is an action for breach of promise to many. While the amended petition was not wholly free from the criticism made by defendant's counsel, for presenting the double aspect of an action in assumpsit for breach of promise to marry and one in trespass for fraud and deceit in bringing about the engagement, which respective actions might present, a different measure of damages, this objection has been obviated. On tlie hearing of the motion of the defendant striking at this claimed defect, plaintiff's counsel stated that he construed the petition as founded alone on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kelley v. RileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Chouteau v. GoddinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  3. Fuller v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. Werner v. WernerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  5. Paddock v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Guffin v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. James v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  3. Smith v. Royal Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  4. Sweinhart v. BambergerNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Joy v. GodchauxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API