Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Miller

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided November 1, 2012No. SUCV201100573BPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Fahey, Elizabeth M., J.

The Commonwealth has commenced the underlying action against defendant Keith Miller (“Miller”) on eleven counts. This matter is currently before the court on the Commonwealth’s Partial Motion for Summary Judgment as to Count III (violation of G.L.c. Ill, § 197A) and Count XI (violation of G.L.c. 93A, §2) arising out of Miller’s alleged failure to provide requisite notices of lead hazards to prospective tenants. For the reasons set for below, the motion is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part.

BACKGROUND

The following facts taken from the summary judgment record are viewed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Paterson-Leitch Company, Inc. v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. LaLonde v. EissnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Attorney General v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API