Legal Opinion

Hollenbach v. . Born

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1924PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.

Before the revision of the section of the Code of Civil Procedure relating to Surrogates’ Courts in 1914, now the Surrogate’s Court Act, section 2613 of the Code provided that administrators with the will annexed shall “ have the rights and powers * * * as if they had been named as executors in the will.” It was held, however, that a naked power of sale of real estate conferred upon the persons named as executors of a will, discretionary in the sense that it is not imperative, unnecessary for the testator’s scheme of administration of his estate, did not pass to the administrator with the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Sackheim v. . PigueronNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Cooke v. . PlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Greenland v. . WaddellNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Rhodes v. . Sperry Hutchinson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States Mortgage & Trust Co. v. RugglesNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Addiss v. SeligNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Kliks v. Dalles CityOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In re the Estate of FrameNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926
  5. In re the Estate of WestNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API