Legal Opinion

O'DONNELL v. Smith

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided July 25, 2007No. 04-04-00108-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice.

Thomas O’Donnell, as executor of the estate of Corwin D. Denney, appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of the law firm and attorneys who provided legal advice to Denney during his lifetime in his capacity as executor of his wife’s estate. This is the second time we have been asked to decide this case. On the first occasion, we affirmed the judgment of the trial court. We held, based on the summary judgment evidence, that O’Donnell could not recover on behalf of Den-ney’s estate because no cause of action for legal malpractice accrued…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Paul H. Smith v. Thomas O'donnell, of the Estate of Corwin DenneyTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Duerr v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  3. Murphy v. Gruber, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  4. Lesieur v. Fryar, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  5. Floyd v. HefnerDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API