Legal Opinion

Goetz v. Ballou

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Case submitted on agreed statement. Controversy between Sophia Regina Goetz and Edward H. Ballou, submitted on an agreed statement of facts under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Judgment for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtMacomber, J.

This controversy arises over the will of Louis Goetz, which bears date the 22d day of April, 1871, and which was admitted to probate on the 4th day of September, 1872, and duly recorded. The portion of the will, the construction of which is sought by this submission, is contained in the third section thereof, and is as follows: “See. 3. 1 give and devise to my daughter Sophia Regina lot number 188, containing ten acres; also lots number 189 and 197 and 202, containing together 70.99-100 acres; also westerly half of lot number 205, containing 16.10-100 acres. All of these lots are of the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Teague v. SowderTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Erwin Nat. Bank v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  3. Travis v. SitzTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Moak v. MoakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Fulton v. MacnoeNew York Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API