Legal Opinion

Crowley v. Polleys Lumber Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1932No. 6,906PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

The cause of action is predicated upon a fire loss sustained by plaintiff, as will presently appear.

In the first paragraph of the complaint plaintiff alleges that defendant was and is a corporation engaged in the lumbering business in Sanders county, Montana, and during the period mentioned in the complaint was operating a logging railroad in that county.

It is alleged that the month of July, 1930, was exceptionally dry and the fire hazard was great, and ordinary care and prudence required of defendant that in the operation of its logging railroad it use and exercise every reasonable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bradford Construction Co. v. HeflinMississippi Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Taylor v. Prairie Pebble Phosphate Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1911
  3. J. Ray Arnold Lumber Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  4. Valley Lumber Co. v. Westmoreland Bros.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. New Deemer Mfg. Co. v. KilpatrickMississippi Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Conley v. ConleyMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Arnold v. BondWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Porter v. EyerArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Porter v. EyerArizona Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API