Legal Opinion

Zamsky v. Pittsburgh Public Parking Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 1, 1954No. Appeals, Nos. 131 and 132PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

Among the properties acquired by the Public Parking Authority of Pittsburgh was one at the corner of Smithfield and Third Avenue, consisting of a four-story, brick building not more than 60 years old. The premises were leased to three tenants, one of which *39operated a restaurant on the ground floor, a Union had a room on the second floor, and Harry J. Zamsky, one of the appellees, operated a barroom on the ground floor and a stag hotel with 26 rooms on upper floors. Wilbur Mervis, the other appellee, had a one-half interest in the Zamsky lease, which he acquired by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Grutski v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Reed v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. H. E. Collins and Joetta Collins, Surviving Parents and Personal Representatives of Karen Collins, Deceased v. Wayne CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Cooper v. SchoffstallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Mohn v. Hahnemann Medical College & HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Spino v. John S. Tilley Ladder Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API