Beran v. Katz
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence, and rule to strike off set-off and counter-claim. C. P. No. 5, Phila. Co., June T., 1923, No. 2874.
1Opinion of the Court
Martin, P. J.,
— The plaintiff claims to recover the amount of two payments made by him under a written contract for the purchase of real estate, averring a breach by defendants and a readiness and willingness to perform upon his part. The affidavit of defence avers readiness, willingness and ability to perform by the defendants, a refusal to perform by the plaintiff, and sets up a set-off and counter-claim for loss of rent and loss upon a resale of the premises for a price less than that contracted to be paid by plaintiff.
The agreement provided for the payment of $200 at signing, “which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Irvin v. BleakleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- Campbell v. ShrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
- Crossgrove v. HimmelrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
- Boyd v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Stickter v. GuldinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858