Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Keizo Kamiyama
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 3, 1930No. 6177PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
44 F.2d 503 (1930)
Ex parte KEIZO KAMIYAMA.
KEIZO KAMIYAMA
v.
CARR, Director of Immigration.
No. 6177.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
November 3, 1930.
Rehearing Denied December 6, 1930.
J. Edward Keating and Theodore E. Bowen, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Samuel W. McNabb, U. S. Atty., and P. V. Davis and Harry Graham Balter, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Los Angeles, Cal. (Harry E. Blee, U. S. Immigration Service, of Los Angeles, Cal., on the brief), for appellee.
Before RUDKIN and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Bilokumsky v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Walker v. SauvinetSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Edwards v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Wilson v. McNameeSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Wood v. A. Wilbert's Sons Shingle & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kishan Singh v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Singh v. District Director of ImmigrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Ex parte AndalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953