Legal Opinion

Schlussel v. Commercial Casualty Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1927No. Docket Nos. 101, 102PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiff in these two cases is a resident of Detroit, engaged in the real estate business. His home is a two-story brick residence at 533 Ferry avenue east. On the evening of May 5, 1922, while he and his family were away from home, attending a charity bazaar, it was broken into and entered by burglars who stole between $5,000 and $6,000 worth of property, consisting largely of jewelry, taking with them a safe which was kept in the hall upstairs and contained most of the property stolen. When the family returned shortly before midnight they found burglars had entered by cutting the glass in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grollimund v. Germania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  2. German Alliance Ins. Co. v. NewbernSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Taber v. Continental InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ever Krisp Food Products Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Charles Taylor Marine, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API