Legal Opinion
(HC) Semones v. Thompson
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 25, 2023No. 2:21-cv-01943Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIMOTHY DAVID SEMONES, No. 2:21-cv-01943 KJM DB P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 PAUL THOMPSON, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Presently before the court is respondent’s motion to dismiss 19 the petition as untimely and for failure to comply with exhaustion requirements. (ECF No. 7.) 20 For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- David P. Pagtalunan v. George Galaza, Warden Thomas Maddock, Acting Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.