In re the City of New York
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWallace R. Cotton, J.
In the instant proceeding, the claimant, Columbia University, seeks to increase the prevailing rate of 6% interest paid on condemnation awards to 8%, on the theory that since the date of vesting (October 1, 1971), *558conditions in the "money” market were such that the prevailing rate of 6% interest is inadequate and thus does not conform to the constitutional requirement of "just compensation”.
"It is settled doctrine that a condemnee is constitutionally entitled to 'some sum in addition to the bare value of the property at the date of taking for the delay in making payment, so that the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Commodities Trading Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Kieselbach v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re South Bronx Neighborhood Development PlanNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- M.B. Claff, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1983
- Casella v. Groton-Dunstable Regional School DistrictMassachusetts Superior Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.