Legal Opinion

Gerhard v. Ford Motor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1909No. Docket No. 159PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Case by Clements Gerhard, by next friend, against the Ford Motor Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff was injured on September 10, 1906, at about 5:30 p. m. He was two or three months over the age of 14. The accident occurred on Piquette avenue, which runs at right angles to Woodward avenue. Plaintiff was employed as a “jumper” on a delivery wagon, and in the performance of his duties it was necessary for him to follow the instructions of his driver and deliver packages to the proper addresses. The first street east of Woodward avenue, and parallel thereto, is John R., and next east of John R. is Brush street. The delivery wagon approached Piquette avenue from the south on John…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hennessey v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Payne v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. Kennedy v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
  4. Caesar v. Fifth Avenue Coach Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
  5. Spina v. New York Transportation Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Deputy v. KimmellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Wine v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Walmer-Roberts v. HennesseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. Aiken v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  5. Budnick v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API