Legal Opinion

Porterfield v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from Criminal Court of Davidson County. John D. BRIEn, Sp. J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

Only a question of costs is to be decided in this case.

It satisfactorily appears, from the imperfect record before us, that T. T. Pussell and C. V. Gohn, members of the police force of Nashville, arrested Sam Porterfield and carried him before the City Peeorder on the charge of carrying a bowie-knife; that the Peeorder bound him over to the Criminal Court of Davidson County; that in said Court he-was indicted for said offense .on the evidence of said Pussell and Gohn; and that, thereafter, when arraigned for trial, they being ready to testify against him, he pleaded guilty to the indictment,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cornet v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Jackson v. City of ParisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  3. Broyles v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State Ex Rel. Harvey v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Johnson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API