State v. Larmand
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Per curiam
Francis Larmand appeals his convictions for second-degree lynching, conspiracy, and pointing and presenting a firearm. He argues the trial court erred in: (1) submitting his written charge to the jury; (2) not directing a verdict on the charges of lynching, conspiracy, and pointing and presenting a firearm; and (3) charging the jury that it may infer all persons who are present as members of a mob when an act of violence is committed are guilty as principals. We reverse.
FACTS
Ryan Lochbaum worked for Larmand’s wife, Kerriann, at Pop-A-Lock from 2005 to October 20Ó8, when he was termi-' nated.1…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- State v. BrandtSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. LarmandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- State v. LemireCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- State v. LarmandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015