Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hollamon v. Vinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 2007No. Appeal No. 1Published

1Dissent

Gorski, J.E, and Green, J. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent. In our view Supreme Court erred in denying plaintiffs motion to set aside the verdict as inconsistent and against the weight of the evidence and in failing to grant a new trial on the issue of proximate cause. Based upon the evidence presented at trial, the jury’s “finding of negligence cannot be reconciled with the jury’s finding of no proximate cause” (Murphy v Holzinger, 6 AD3d 1072, 1072-1073 [2004]). Evidence that plaintiff may have been interacting with people on the street and interrupting the smooth flow of traffic,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bucich v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Mazurek v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Murphy v. HolzingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API