Legal Opinion

Hoke v. First Security Trust Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 28, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOoNNOR, J.

In Speed v. Perry, 167 N. C., 122, 83 S. E., 176, which was an action to set aside certain deeds described in the complaint on the ground, among others, that the grantor in said deeds was without sufficient mental capacity to execute the same, it is said:

“There is another question in this case; the plaintiffs have shown no right to bring this suit. They have no cause of action. The real estate did not vest in them. This Court held, in Floyd v. Herring, 64 N. C., 409, following Ferebee v. Procter, 19 N. C., 439, that 'a personal representative has no control of the freehold estate of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Speed v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Speed v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Den Ex Dem. Ferebee v. ProcterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837
  4. Floyd v. . HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  5. Barbee v. . CannadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abernethy v. First Security Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Jones v. . WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. In re the Estate of KirkmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API