Legal Opinion
United States v. Hubler
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 8, 1990No. Civ. A. 88-2105PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BLOCH, District Judge.
Presently before this Court are motions for summary judgment filed by both parties. In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, this Court must examine the facts in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion. International Raw Materials, Inc. v. Stauffer Chemical Co., 898 F.2d 946, 949 (3d Cir.1990). Summary judgment may be granted only if “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits ... show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ohio v. KovacsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Shawnee Coal Company v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Penn Terra Ltd. v. Department of Environmental ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Chateaugay Corp. (In Re Chateaugay Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Apex Oil Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Merrill Farms Corp. v. H.R. Hindle & Co., Inc. (In Re H.R. Hindle & Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Kentucky, Natural Resources Cabinet v. Daniels (In Re Daniels)District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1991
- United States v. Apex Oil Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Hubler (Harold R.), Taylor (Leon G.), D/B/A H & T Coal Company Hubler (Harold), Taylor (Leon), D/B/A H & T Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991