Legal Opinion

Manning v. Arch Wood Protection, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided August 21, 2014No. Civil Action No. 13-127-HRW-CJSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

CANDACE J. SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Motion of Defendants Arch Wood Protections, Inc. (“Arch Wood”), Osmose, Inc. (“Os-mose”), Chemical Specialties, Inc. (“CSI”), Koppers Inc. (“Koppers”) and T.R. Miller Mill Co., Inc.’s (“T.R. Miller”) (collectively “Defendants”) to Require Plaintiffs to Produce an Expert Opinion on General Causation Before Discovery Commences {“Lone Pine Motion”) and Defendants’ Motion for Oral Argument on their Lone Pine Motion. (R. 43, 44). Plaintiffs filed a Response (R. 47) to which Defendants filed a Reply…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Acuna v. Brown & Root Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  2. Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Robin L. Albright v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. Steering Committee v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API