Legal Opinion

P. J. Panzeca, Inc. v. Board of Education

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1971PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, the motion to dismiss the complaint granted, and the question certified answered in the negative. Even assuming that an order to show cause with accompanying papers in an action for an injunction may qualify as a verified claim for purposes of subdivision 1 of section 3813 of the Education Law, the papers are nevertheless defective. In the absence of circumstances demonstrating impracticability, the critical element in a verified claim in a contract action is the monetary demand and some suggestion at least on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Munroe v. BoothNew York Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Russell v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  3. Rondout Electric, Inc. v. Dover Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. City School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Christian v. Town of RigaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API