McKay v. Friebele
Supreme Court of Florida
This case was decided at Tampa. Eriebele brought his action of assumpsit against McKay in Hillsborough Circuit Court, stating the damages in the iprmavpe at $249 SO.
Read the full summary
This case was decided at Tampa. Eriebele brought his action of assumpsit against McKay in Hillsborough Circuit Court, stating the damages in the iprmavpe at $249 SO. The declaration is as follows: For that whereas, heretofore, to wit: on the seventh day of April, one thousand eight hundred and fifty one, the said James McKay made, and entered into a certain instrument of assignment, which is as follows : This instrument of assignment made the seventh day of April, A. D. 1851, by Joseph W. Fitch and Harrison E. Blanchard of the first part, assigns, and James McKay assignee, witnesseth:…
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, J.
This was an action of assumpsit, and is brought up to this Court by writ of error from the Circuit Court of Hills-borough county. The declaration contains three counts. The first is a special count, setting out at large the instrument of writing out of which the cause of action is alleged to have arisen. The others are for money advanced and an account stated. There was a demurrer to the whole declaration, but the grounds of demurrer assigned point mainly to the first count. Judgment was given for the plaintiff upon the demurrer, and this ruling is assigned by the appellant, who was the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Brite, Et Vir v. Orange Belt Securities Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Benedict v. W. T. Hadlow Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1906
- Gilmer v. BirdSupreme Court of Florida · 1875
- Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co. v. NeffSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
- Cooper v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.