Legal Opinion

Macondray v. Wardle

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1858Published

Appeal from a judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.—Ingraham, J.

—The plaintiffs seek to compel the application of certain real property standing in the name of Belinda Wardle, to the payment of a judgment, re*4covered against her husband, Thomas Wardle, upon the ground that it in reality belonged to the husband, and was bought in the name of the wife to defraud the creditors of the husband.

Upon the trial of the cause, the plaintiffs called on their behalf Belinda Wardle as a witness, who was objected to and excluded by the court.

The plaintiffs then offered to call her against herself only. This also was objected to, and the witness…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Erwin v. SmallerThe Superior Court of New York City · 1849
  2. Lay Grae v. PetersonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1849

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API