Bloomquist v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
' Two actions in the district court for Hennepin county, one by Charles G. Bloomquist, to recover $16,300 for personal injuries sustained in a collision with defendant’s street car, and the other by him and his partner to recover $350 for injury to property.' The facts' are stated- in the opinion. .The answers were general denials/ The cases weré tried together before Brooks, J., and a- jury which returned verdicts in favor, of defendant.
Read the full summary
' Two actions in the district court for Hennepin county, one by Charles G. Bloomquist, to recover $16,300 for personal injuries sustained in a collision with defendant’s street car, and the other by him and his partner to recover $350 for injury to property.' The facts' are stated- in the opinion. .The answers were general denials/ The cases weré tried together before Brooks, J., and a- jury which returned verdicts in favor, of defendant. From orders denying their motions for a new trial, plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Jaggard, J. .
Plaintiff and appellant in one action, Bloomquist, was driving a horse and wagon with contents, the property-of plaintiff and appellant partnership in another, action, Bloomquist & Co., on the left-hand side of the street going north because the right-hand side wa3 unsafe and otherwise undesirable. The car of defendant and respondent street car company was being operated by it on the right-hand side of the street going north. .There was occasion for use of considerable care by defendant in' the management' of' its cars at this point. At a public crossing plaintiff Bloomquist ■…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Rawitzer v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Rawitzer v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Harmon v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
3Cited by2 opinions
- Newton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Langdon v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912