Legal Opinion

City of Salem ex rel. Roney v. Young

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1910PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Dent Circuit Court. — Hon. Harry Glymer, Special Judge. (1) This action on the taxbill was properly brought against the defendant Young. He was, in fact, the sole owner of the land against which the lien is sought to be enforced. Hernán y, McNamara, 77 Mo. App. 1. (2) However, a valid judgment- on a special taxbill may be rendered without bringing in all the owners of the property as defendants. Granite Co. v. Taylor, 64 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Dent Circuit Court. — Hon. Harry Glymer, Special Judge. (1) This action on the taxbill was properly brought against the defendant Young. He was, in fact, the sole owner of the land against which the lien is sought to be enforced. Hernán y, McNamara, 77 Mo. App. 1. (2) However, a valid judgment- on a special taxbill may be rendered without bringing in all the owners of the property as defendants. Granite Co. v. Taylor, 64 Mo. App. 37; Neenan v. St. Joseph, 126 Mo. 89. (3) It was not necessary that defendant’s land should have been platted before being included within an extension…

1Opinion of the CourtNixon, P. J.

(after stating the facts.) — I. The question is raised by the respondent as to the proper parties defendant to the suit on the taxbill. It is contended that one L. N. Coffman was a joint owner with the respondent and should have been made a party defendant in tbe suit.

Tbe evidence tends to show that prior to tbe suit on tbe taxbill, tbe joint owners, Young and Coffman, made a verbal partition, Young receiving tbe portion of tbe land on which the sidewalk in question abuts, and it appears that Coffman constructed bis portion of tbe sidewalk in compliance with tbe ordinance along tbe tract…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grandy v. CaseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  2. Corrigan v. GageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  3. Copeland v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. Black v. EarlySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. State ex rel. Musser v. BirchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hand v. BilyeuMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Henderson v. School District No. 44Montana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Central Missouri Oil Co. v. City of St. JamesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Stoltman v. City of ClaytonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Webb v. StrobachMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API