Legal Opinion
State v. Manning
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 25, 2002No. S-01-130PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Following a bench trial, Diann M. Manning was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-416(3) (Cum. Supp. 2000). Manning claims that evidence obtained during a search of her purse while police officers were executing an unrelated search warrant on her house was inadmissible and that the trial court erred in overruling her motions to suppress.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
A trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress evidence, apart from determinations of reasonable suspicion to conduct investigatory stops and probable cause to perform warrantless…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. KonfrstNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. GalesNebraska Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. BallNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. RathjenNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. PetersenNebraska Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. PulsNebraska Court of Appeals · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.