Legal Opinion

Hickson Lumber Co. v. Stallings

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 16, 1909No. 7217PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Watts, J., Darlington, May, 1908. Action by Hickson Lumber Company against Sylvester Stallings. From order transferring case from Calendar 1 to Calendar 2, for trial of equitable issues, defendant appeals. cites: 77 S. C., 1; 60 S. C., 559; 32 S. C., 214. Mr. Woods cites: 79 S. C., 266, 420; 61 S, C., 1; 77 S. C., 1; 43 S. C., 192; 47 S. C., 189; 53 S, C., 130; 1 Bail., 23; 66 S. C., 84. Mr. Caston cites: 56 S. C., 298-; 27 S. C., 408; 79 S. C., 473; 49 S. C., 95; 54…

Read the full summary

Before Watts, J., Darlington, May, 1908. Action by Hickson Lumber Company against Sylvester Stallings. From order transferring case from Calendar 1 to Calendar 2, for trial of equitable issues, defendant appeals. cites: 77 S. C., 1; 60 S. C., 559; 32 S. C., 214. Mr. Woods cites: 79 S. C., 266, 420; 61 S, C., 1; 77 S. C., 1; 43 S. C., 192; 47 S. C., 189; 53 S, C., 130; 1 Bail., 23; 66 S. C., 84. Mr. Caston cites: 56 S. C., 298-; 27 S. C., 408; 79 S. C., 473; 49 S. C., 95; 54 S, C., 430; 23 S. C., 388; 79 S. C., 266; 60 S. C., 391; 11 Am. Dec., 500; 52 S. C., 461; 70S. C., 282.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The appeal herein is from an order of his Honor, the Circuit Judge, transferring the case from Calendar 1 to Calendar 2. The reason assigned by him was that the issues raised by the pleadings, other than the question of damages, should be tried by the Court, and that they should be determined before the trial of the question of damages.

The practical question presented by the exceptions is whether the appellant was entitled to a trial by jury, upon all the issues raised by the pleadings, on the ground that such issues were legal.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pratt v. TimmermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  2. Ex Parte LandrumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sloan v. BurnettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. Cantey v. Edward L. Summersett & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Beal v. DivineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API