Legal Opinion

Bennett v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On contract. On demurrer to replication. The facts appear fully in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beasley, Chief Justice.

An issue of law is here presented for solution.

The suit is on a policy of fire insurance, the declaration being in the usual form. To the cause of action thus laid the defendant, in its second plea, defends on the gound that the policy declared on was subject to a certain condition, to wit, that “ this entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement endorsed thereon, or added hereto, shall be void if the insured now has, or shall hereafter make or procure any other contract of insurance, whether valid or not, on the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dimick v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  2. Johnson v. Continental Insurance Co. of New YorkTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Melick v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  4. New Orleans, Baton Rouge & Bayou Sara Packet Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API