Legal Opinion

Amazon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 20, 2004No. 2D03-4440Published

1Per curiam

Affirmed. See Amazon v. State, 487 So.2d 8 (Fla.1986); State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985); Wright v. State, 864 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (en banc); Cook v. State, 816 So.2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Mobley v. State, 590 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). As this court did in Wright, we certify direct conflict with: Kirtsey v. State, 855 So.2d 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Hernandez v. State, 825 So.2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Bingham v. State, 813 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Thames v. State, 769 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Amazon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Cook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Hampton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. MacIas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API