Harris v. Ashley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Petitioners contend that the trial court erred in failing to make findings of fact as to what interests petitioners and respondents own in the land. The court found as fact
4. That there is a genuine issue as to what interest the petitioners and the respondents own in said land.
and then ordered a partition sale and
3. That the Commissioners distribute the proceeds from said sale after paying expenses of said sale and satisfying the deed of trust herein referred to as follows: one-ninth interest to each of the petitioners; and four-ninths interests to the respondents.
We agree with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Wharton v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Combs v. CombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Combs v. CombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- EAST COAST OIL COMPANY v. FairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- North Carolina National Bank v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Biggs v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Harris v. GilchristCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Kelly v. State of N.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.