King v. Keith
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentGoodwyn, Justice
I concur in the majority opinion, except that part which approves the allowance for expenses.
The revised statement of expenses is in the amount of $10,374.78. The trial court allowed $5,187.39, which is exactly one-half of that claimed. The decree does not disclose how this amount was arrived at, other than the expression in the court’s opinion “that the claim of petitioner for expenses-incurred by him in connection with the rendition of said services in the amount of $10,374.78 is excessive, ahd that only one-half of said amount, namely: $5,187.39' should be approved and allowed.”
The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hines v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924