Legal Opinion
Barrick Realty, Incorporated v. City of Gary, Indiana
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided January 18, 1973No. Civ. No. 72 H 259 (2)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
ESCHBACH, District Judge.
This action for declaratory and injunctive relief challenges the validity of Ordinance No. 4685 of the City of Gary, Indiana, which prohibits the display of “For Sale”, “Sold”, or similar signs on premises located in residential areas of the city. 1 The plaintiffs are Barrick Realty, Inc., Daniel W. Barrick, Jr., its president, and Thomas G. Harrison, a homeowner and resident of Gary. The defendants are the City of Gary and certain city officials. Plaintiffs contend that the ordinance is ultra vires under Indiana laws relating to the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Zuch v. HusseyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1975
- Barrick Realty, Incorporated v. City of Gary, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Village of Bellwood v. Gladstone Realtors, Village of Bellwood v. Robert A. Hintze RealtorsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Kenneth B. Stephens, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. George P. Tielsch, Chief of Police of the City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.