Legal Opinion

Free v. Ohl

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County

Decided November 17, 1992No. 92-S-752Published

1Opinion of the Court

SPICER, PJ.

Plaintiffs, a married couple, by their complaint, filed August 18, 1992, seek damages for what they characterize as an unauthorized tubal ligation performed on Mrs. Free by Dr. Ohl. The Frees sue in negligence as well as battery and Mr. Free seeks damages for loss of consortium. A demand for punitive damages is made in connection with the battery action, Count II.

The doctor’s preliminary objections attack the negligence count (I), the demand for punitive damages (paragraph 16) and Mr. Free’s action (Count III). We will address these in order.

Negligence: Unauthorized medical…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Evans v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Focht v. RabadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Buttermore v. Aliquippa HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Hopkins v. BlancoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. McClellan v. Health Maintenance OrganizationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API