Legal Opinion

Highfill v. Hale

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 21, 2006No. SC 86987PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Chief Justice.

Introduction

If “good fences make good neighbors,”1 what do bad fences make?

*279On the portion of James and Daniel Highfills’ property that is adjacent to Mary Hale’s property in- rural Gasconade County, there is an eight-foot high metal fence spray-painted with pictures and phrases on the side facing Hale’s property and “one-way glass” installed in one portion of the fence. The one-way glass would allow someone • standing on the Highfills’ property to observe Hale’s house and yard without Hale being able to see them. Video cameras are mounted on top of the fence in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Rustici v. WeidemeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. Blue v. Harrah's North Kansas City, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Warrem v. ParrishSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. Snider v. WimberlySupreme Court of Missouri · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Stanley Joseph v. Kenneth AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  2. Michael Holmes v. Bobby Lee GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  3. Zike v. Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of Missouri, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. Green v. MissouriDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2010
  5. White v. City of LadueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API