Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Merchant

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 23, 1935No. 11894PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOND, Justice.

This suit arose under the Workmen’s Compensation law (article 8306, et seq. R. S. 1925, as amended [Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 8306 et seq.]). The appellant sustained her alleged injuries on August 13, 1932, and filed a claim for compensation therefor with the Industrial Accident Board on April 8, 1933. From an award by the Industrial Accident Board, ap-pellee appealed to the district court, and after a trial before a jury upon special issues, judgment was entered against appellant for $2,303.56, payable in a lump sum for accrued and future compensation; $250 for operation and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Consolidated Underwriters v. SealeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Zurich General Accident & Fidelity Ins. Co. v. WalkerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Elsea v. Broome Furniture Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Lacour v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. HerzikCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Martin v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Hurd v. Republic UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API