Legal Opinion
Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 24, 2006No. 2004-1522Published
1Opinion of the Court
439 F.3d 1312
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, SmithKline Beecham, P.L.C., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants, and
GlaxoSmithKline, P.L.C., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, and
Beecham Group, P.L.C., Plaintiff,
v.
APOTEX CORPORATION, Apotex Inc., and Torpharm, Inc. Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellees.
No. 04-1522.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
February 24, 2006.
Ford F. Farabow, Jr., Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were Robert D. Bajefsky, Howard W.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio, in No. 93-5208 v. Foster Wheeler Corporation Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation. Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio v. Foster Wheeler Corporation Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation in No. 93-5233. Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio v. Foster Wheeler Corporation Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.