State ex rel. Tucker v. Mitchell
Missouri Court of Appeals
Original Proceeding by Petition for Writ of Oertiorari to Review Action of Connty Court. County courts are authorized to hold as many adjourned terms as they deem necessary. All business done at such adjourned terms is considered as done at one and the same time. Adjourned terms are part of the regular terms at which order was made. State ex rel. v. County Court, 45 Mo. App. 395; Fannon v. Plummer, 30 Mo.
Read the full summary
Original Proceeding by Petition for Writ of Oertiorari to Review Action of Connty Court. County courts are authorized to hold as many adjourned terms as they deem necessary. All business done at such adjourned terms is considered as done at one and the same time. Adjourned terms are part of the regular terms at which order was made. State ex rel. v. County Court, 45 Mo. App. 395; Fannon v. Plummer, 30 Mo. App. 27; State ex rel. v. Railway,. 101 Mo. 150; Higgins v. Randall, 13 Mo. 146. The county court can grant a license to a dramshop keeper at any term of said court, provided the petitioner…
1Opinion of the CourtNortoni, J.
This is an original proceeding in this court. The relator, prosecuting attorney of St. Francois county, sued out a writ of certiorari, seeking to quash certain proceedings had in the county court of that county whereby one Carter Ashlock was granted’ a license to keep a dramshop, and to revoke such license. It appears the dramshop license in question was granted at a special term of the . county court. This special term of court was ordered and held during the period intervening between .the adjournment of the regular May term and its reconvening in an adjourned term. In other words, such…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. JefforsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- Waters v. WatersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- State ex rel. Reider v. Moniteau County CourtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
- State v. RiddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
- St. Louis Brewing Ass'n v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jones v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- State ex rel. Dick v. WiethauptMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912