Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Rensselaer

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1873PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBockes, J.

The action is for the foreclosure of a mortgage. The amount claimed to be due and secured thereby is $500, with interest from May 1, 1871. The defendants are Mary F. Van Rensselaer, Jane A. Martyn, John Van Rensselaer, and Horatio N. Squires, all of whom make default except the first-named Mary F. Van Rensselaer. The equity of redemption is in the defendant Jane A. Martyn, who took title subject to the mortgage.

It is conceded that the plaintiff, as the case stands before me, is entitled to have the premises sold and the avails applied on the debt claimed in the complaint. But Mary A. Van…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. The Bank of Albion v. . BurnsNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Turk v. . RidgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Elder v. RouseNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  4. Rodman v. MunsonNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Chase v. EwingNew York Supreme Court · 1868

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stilwell v. CarpenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Hoskins v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Jewett v. BrownellNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Smith v. RiceNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API